Tel Aviv University Tries to Suppress Freedom of Expression
- ACRI
- May 20
- 1 min read
On May 21, 2025, we called on the rector of Tel Aviv University to retract his illegitimate directive to academic staff members to refrain from expressing political positions and to limit themselves to positions based on "broad public consensus." Attorney Tal Hassin wrote that this directive, which corresponds with attempts by the right to restrict and control university activities, harms academic freedom, freedom of expression, and freedom of thought; creates a chilling effect and intimidates students and academics into silence; harms minority groups; suppresses democratic and liberal positions; and goes against the university's own code of ethics.
The appeal also states that "consensus" is a vague and subjective concept. It is defined within systems of control and power, and the role of an academic institution is precisely to challenge it.
The fact that a certain position is part of a consensus does not render an opposing position illegitimate. In fact, it is legitimate—and sometimes even obligatory—to express challenging positions, particularly in academic institutions, which are (allegedly) committed to freedom of expression and the development of critical thinking skills.
ACRI's appeal, May 21, 2025