Involvement of the Shin Bet in Criminal Investigations
- ACRI
- May 5
- 3 min read
Updated: May 12
On May 23, 2023, the Association for Civil Rights in Israel petitioned the Supreme Court to establish a protocol for opening Shin Bet investigations in cases of suspected felonies, and to anchor the requirement for consultation between the head of the Shin Bet and the State Attorney as a condition for initiating an investigation.
The petition emphasized that following the riots of May 2021, there has been increasing political pressure on the Shin Bet to intervene in criminal investigations in diverse contexts that are far removed from the narrow context of suppressing threats to national security. These investigations involve acts of disorder, hate crimes, cases related to organized crime, and more, all while adopting an expansive interpretation of the Shin Bet's responsibilities.
In the petition, we stressed the crucial distinction between the covert activities of the Shin Bet - an intelligence agency tasked with countering severe threats to national security or the foundations of the democratic regime - and the activities of the police. To fulfill its role, the Shin Bet was granted extensive and covert powers, and their involvement in criminal matters poses significant violations of the rights of suspects (the petition includes a table illustrating the vast differences in investigative powers between the Shin Bet and the police).
Therefore, the petition argued that the legal interpretation regarding the investigative authority of the Shin Bet must be limited and clear, and the "gray area" between the police and the Shin Bet must be minimal. Suspects should only be investigated by the Shin Bet in clear cases of endangering national security, and involvement in cases falling within the gray area should only occur in exceptional circumstances, where the criteria for suppression and prevention of threats to national security are met. To achieve this, strict and transparent measures are required for the exercise of the Shin Bet's investigative powers, and the actions of the Shin Bet in this context should be subject to real-time oversight by the State Attorney."
During the legal proceedings, it was revealed that the Shin Bet has a classified procedure regarding its involvement in criminal investigations, and in a hearing held on July 22, 2024, the procedure was discussed with the court ex parte. Following the court's comments, the procedure was amended, and consequently, the court decided on May 5, 2025, to dismiss the petition. In its ruling, the court outlined several features that would be incorporated into the process. For example, a single criterion would not be sufficient to classify an event as justifying Shin Bet involvement, and it established when the Shin Bet should transfer the investigation to the police. Regarding the publication of the process, the court noted that the Prime Minister has the legal authority to publish it but did not order the Prime Minister to do so, and considered it sufficient to outline the main points of the process as detailed in the ruling.
High Court of Justice 3945/23 Association for Civil Rights in Israel v. Chief of the General Security Service
Attorney: Gil Gan-Moor, Anne Sucio
Petition (Hebrew)
State's Update, November 2024 (Heb)
Petitioner's Response, November 2024 (Heb)
Court Ruling, May 5, 2025 (Heb)
Links (Heb):
Itamar Levin, "Shin Bet Established a Consultation Requirement with Its Legal Counsel Before Opening Investigations," May 5, 2025, News1
Chen Maanit, "State Refuses to Disclose the Procedure by Which Shin Bet Decides Whether to Intervene in an Incident Suspected as Criminal," Haaretz, July 23, 2024